Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Cheque Bounce Law in India: Section 138 NI Act Explained Simply

 


Cheque bounce cases have become one of the most common legal disputes in India. Almost every court in the country deals daily with matters related to Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. From small shopkeepers to large business owners, many people have either faced a cheque bounce case or are unsure what to do when a cheque gets dishonoured.

 

I have seen many people panic the moment they hear the words “Section 138 notice.” Some believe jail is guaranteed, while others think the case can be ignored. Both beliefs are wrong. This blog explains, in simple words, what a cheque bounce case is, how Section 138 works, the legal procedure, defences, punishment, and the latest court judgments that every common person should know.

 

What Is a Cheque Bounce?

 

A cheque is said to be “bounced” when a bank refuses to honour it and returns it unpaid. This usually happens due to:

 

* Insufficient funds in the account

* Account closed

* Payment stopped by drawer

* Signature mismatch

* Exceeds arrangement

 

However, not every bounced cheque becomes a criminal case. Section 138 applies only when certain legal conditions are fulfilled.

 

What Is Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act?

 

Section 138 NI Act makes cheque dishonour a criminal offence, provided the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability.

 

The intention of the law is not to send people to jail, but to ensure trust in commercial transactions and protect the payee.

 

Essential Conditions for Section 138 Case

 

For a valid cheque bounce case under Section 138, all the following conditions must be satisfied:

 

1. The cheque must be issued for repayment of a legally enforceable debt or liability

2. The cheque must be presented within its validity period

3. The cheque must be returned unpaid by the bank

4. The payee must send a legal demand notice within 30 days of receiving the bank return memo

5. The drawer must fail to make payment within 15 days of receiving the notice

 

If even one condition is missing, the Section 138 case may fail.

 

Legal Procedure in a Cheque Bounce Case

 

Step 1: Cheque Dishonour

 

The bank issues a return memo stating the reason for dishonour.

 

Step 2: Legal Notice

 

A written legal notice must be sent within 30 days demanding payment of the cheque amount.

 

Step 3: Waiting Period

 

The drawer gets 15 days to make the payment. If payment is made, the matter ends.

 

Step 4: Filing of Complaint

 

If payment is not made, a criminal complaint is filed before the Magistrate within 30 days.

 

Step 5: Trial

 

The court records evidence, hears both sides, and passes judgment.

 

Punishment Under Section 138

 

If found guilty, the accused may face:

 

* Imprisonment up to 2 years, or

* Fine up to twice the cheque amount, or

* Both

 

In practice, courts prefer compensation and settlement over imprisonment, especially in first-time cases.

 

Can a Cheque Bounce Case Be Settled?

 

Yes. Cheque bounce cases are compoundable, meaning they can be settled at any stage.

 

The Supreme Court has repeatedly encouraged:

 

* Early settlement

* Mediation

* Payment of compensation instead of long trials

 

Settlement saves time, money, and mental stress for both parties.

 

Important Defences Available to the Accused

 

Many people believe that once a cheque bounces, conviction is automatic. That is not true. Common defences include:

 

* Cheque was not issued for legally enforceable debt

* Cheque was given as security

* Amount already paid partially or fully

* Cheque misused or stolen

* No proper legal notice served

 

Each case depends on facts and evidence, not assumptions.

 

Latest and Important Supreme Court Judgments

 

1. Bir Singh v. Mukesh Kumar (2019)

 

The Supreme Court held that once a cheque is signed and issued, presumption under Section 139 applies, even if other details are filled later. The burden shifts to the accused to prove otherwise.

 

2. Meters and Instruments Pvt. Ltd. v. Kanchan Mehta (2017)

 

The Court clarified that the primary object of Section 138 is compensatory, not punitive. Courts should encourage settlement and avoid unnecessary imprisonment.

 

3. P. Mohanraj v. Shah Brothers (2021)

 

It was held that IBC moratorium applies to Section 138 proceedings against a company, but not against directors personally.

 

4. Kalamani Tex v. P. Balasubramanian (2021)

 

The Supreme Court reiterated that financial capacity of the complainant need not be proved initially once cheque issuance is admitted.

 

5. Sunil Todi v. State of Gujarat (2021)

 

The Court held that even cheques issued by directors or authorized signatories can attract liability under Section 138.

 

6. In Re: Expeditious Trial of Cases Under Section 138 NI Act (2021–2023)

 

The Supreme Court issued continuous directions to:

 

* Speed up cheque bounce trials

* Use mediation

* Avoid unnecessary adjournments

* Reduce burden on criminal courts

 

These directions are now being followed by lower courts across India.

 

Is Jail Mandatory in Cheque Bounce Cases?

 

No. Jail is not mandatory. Courts usually order:

 

* Payment of cheque amount

* Additional compensation

* Reasonable fine

 

Imprisonment is generally imposed only when:

 

* Accused repeatedly defaults

* There is deliberate non-compliance

* Court orders are ignored

 

Practical Advice From Experience

 

From practical experience, I can say this clearly:

 

* Ignoring a legal notice is a mistake

* Early legal advice saves money

* Settlement is often the best solution

* Delay weakens both sides

 

Many cheque bounce cases drag on for years simply because parties refuse to communicate.

 

 

Conclusion

 

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act plays a crucial role in maintaining trust in financial transactions. While it is a criminal provision, courts have consistently clarified that its purpose is recovery of money, not punishment.

 

Understanding the procedure, time limits, legal rights, and latest judgments can protect you from unnecessary fear and confusion. Whether you are a complainant or an accused, legal awareness is your strongest defence.

 

Cheque bounce cases are serious, but they are also manageable, if handled correctly and on time.


❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

 

Cheque Bounce Case Under Section 138 NI Act

 

 1. What is a cheque bounce case under Section 138?

 

A cheque bounce case arises when a cheque issued for repayment of a legally enforceable debt is dishonoured by the bank and the drawer fails to make payment even after receiving a legal notice within the prescribed time.

 

 2. Is cheque bounce a criminal offence in India?

 

Yes, cheque bounce is a criminal offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

 

3. What are the common reasons for cheque bounce?

 

Common reasons include insufficient funds, account closed, payment stopped, signature mismatch, or cheque exceeding arrangement.

 

 4. Is sending a legal notice mandatory in cheque bounce cases?

 

Yes, sending a legal demand notice within 30 days of receiving the cheque return memo is mandatory. Without a valid notice, a Section 138 case is not maintainable.

 

5. How much time is given to pay after receiving the legal notice?

 

The drawer of the cheque gets 15 days from the date of receipt of the legal notice to make the payment. If payment is made within this period, no case can be filed.

 

6. Can a cheque bounce case be settled?

 

Yes, cheque bounce cases are compoundable and can be settled at any stage—before trial, during trial, or even at the appeal stage.

 

7. Can a cheque bounce case be filed without a lawyer?

 

Legally, a person can file a cheque bounce case without a lawyer. However, due to technical procedures and timelines, legal assistance is strongly recommended.

 

8. What if the cheque was given only as security?

 

If the cheque was issued as security and not towards a legally enforceable debt, the accused may take this defence. However, the burden of proof lies on the accused.

 

9. Can a company director be held liable in a cheque bounce case?

 

Yes, directors or authorised signatories responsible for the conduct of the company’s business can be held liable under Section 138.

 

10. How long does a cheque bounce case take in court?

 

There is no fixed time limit. However, the Supreme Court has directed courts to dispose of cheque bounce cases expeditiously, preferably within a reasonable time.

 

11. What happens if the accused ignores court summons?

 

Ignoring court summons can lead to issuance of warrants and stricter legal action. It is always advisable to appear before the court or seek legal remedy.

  

No comments:

Post a Comment